References

Baker, M. 2016. “1500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility.” Nature 533. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.

Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic press.

Hays, William. 1994. Statistics. 5th ed. Cengage Learning.

Lee Rodgers, Joseph, and W Alan Nicewander. 1988. “Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient.” The American Statistician 42 (1): 59–66.

Margulis, Dan. 2005. Photoshop LAB Color: The Canyon Conundrum and Other Adventures in the Most Powerful Colorspace. Peachpit Press.

Meyer, John P, Natalie J Allen, and Catherine A Smith. 1993. “Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (4): 538.

Miyakawa, T. 2020. “No Raw Data, No Science: Another Possible Source of the Reproducibility Crisis.” Mol Brain 13 (24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2.

Nosek. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.

Patil P., & Leek J. T, Peng R. D. 2019. “A Visual Tool for Defining Reproducibility and Replicability.” Nat Hum Behav 3: 650–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0629-z.

Schäfer, Thomas, and Marcus A Schwarz. 2019. “The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813.

Schmidt, Frank L, and John E Hunter. 2014. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage.

Simmons, Joseph P, Leif D Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–66.

Wickham, Hadley. 2014. “Tidy Data.” The Journal of Statistical Software 59. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v59/i10/.